ABSTRACT
Objective: Is to find out which revascularization methods have less of risk factors and complications after the surgery and long-term period. Method(s): From January 2018 to December 2019 were operated 134 patients with LAD CTO. 48 of them underwent MIDCAB: 36 (75%) males and 12 (25%) females;aged 58.7 +/-8.7;7 (14.6%) with previous diabetes;10 (20.8%) with previous PCI of LAD with drug-eluting stent. In the PCI group there were 86 patients: 52 (60.5%) males and 34 (39.5%) females;aged 64.8 +/-8.3;23 (26.7%) with previous diabetes. Result(s): Hospital mortality was 0 (0%) in MIDCAB unlike 1 (1.2%) in PCI. Myocardial infarction was 0 (0%) in both the groups. In MIDCAB the number of conversions to onpump and sternotomy was 0 (0%), there were 6 (12.5%) pleuritis with pleural puncture and 3 (6.2%) with long wound-aches. The hospitalization period was 10.7+/-2.9 days for MIDCAB and 9.9 +/-3.9 days for PCI. In the PCI group 2.0 +/-1.0 drug-eluting stents were used. In-hospital costs were higher for PCI 3809 unlike 3258 for MIDCAB. After one year in MIDCAB group died 2 (4.2%) patients, from noncardiac causes. In PCI group died 3 (3.5%) patients, all from cardiac causes. Because of pandemic COVID-19 were checked only 48 patients by angiography and general clinical examination: 25 after MIDCAB and 23 after PCI. 5 patients have a graft failure, caused by surgical mistakes. 4 patients have stents restenosis and 1 has LAD's reocclusion. Conclusion(s): Both methods of revascularization for LAD CTO are demonstrated similar results. EuroSCORE II (P = 0.008) and glomerular filtrating rate (P = 0.004) are significant potential risk factors for mortality in both groups, age is potential risk factor for graft failure (P = 0.05). Dyslipidemia is significant risk factor for LAD restenosis in PCI group (P = 0.02). MIDCAB is associated with lower incidence of revascularization repeat and in-hospital mortality in the literature data and it costs lower than PCI for LAD CTO as our study has shown.
ABSTRACT
Objectives: The aim of this study was to assess Jordanian physicians' awareness about venous thromboembolism (VTE) risk among COVID-19 patients and its treatment protocol. Method(s): This was a cross-sectional-based survey that was conducted in Jordan in 2020. During the study period, a convenience sample of physicians working in various Jordanian hospitals were invited to participate in this study. Physicians' knowledge was evaluated and physicians gained one point for each correct answer. Then, a knowledge score out of 23 was calculated for each. Key Findings: In this study, 102 physicians were recruited. Results from this study showed that most of the physicians realize that all COVID-19 patients need VTE risk assessment (n = 69, 67.6%). Regarding VTE prophylaxis, the majority of physicians (n = 91, 89.2%) agreed that low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) is the best prophylactic option for mild-moderate COVID-19 patients with high VTE risk. Regarding severe/critically ill COVID-19 patients, 75.5% of physicians (n = 77) recognized that LMWH is the correct prophylactic option in this case, while 80.4% of them (n = 82) knew that mechanical prevention is the preferred prophylactic option for severe/critically ill COVID-19 patients with high bleeding risk. Moreover, 77.5% of physicians (n = 79) knew that LMWH is the treatment of choice for COVID-19 patients diagnosed with VTE. Finally, linear regression analysis showed that consultants had an overall higher knowledge score about VTE prevention and treatment in COVID-19 patients compared with residents (P = 0.009). Conclusion(s): All physicians knew about VTE risk factors for COVID-19 patients. However, consultants showed better awareness of VTE prophylaxis and treatment compared with residents. We recommend educational workshops be conducted to enhance physicians' knowledge and awareness about VTE thromboprophylaxis and management in COVID-19 patients.Copyright © 2022 The Author(s). Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Royal Pharmaceutical Society. All rights reserved.
ABSTRACT
Submission content Introduction: An unusual case of a very young patient without previously known cardiac disease presenting with severe left ventricular failure, detected by a point of care echocardiogram. Main Body: A 34 year old previously well man was brought to hospital after seeing his general practitioner with one month of progressive shortness of breath on exertion. This began around the time the patient received his second covid-19 vaccination. He was sleeping in a chair as he was unable to lie flat. Abnormal observations led the GP to call an ambulance. In the emergency department, the patient required oxygen 5L/min to maintain SpO2 >94%, but he was not in respiratory distress at rest. Blood pressure was 92/53mmHg, mean 67mmHg. Point of care testing for COVID-19 was negative. He was alert, with warm peripheries. Lactate was 1.0mmol/L and he was producing more than 0.5ml/kg/hr of urine. There was no ankle swelling. ECG showed sinus tachycardia. He underwent CT pulmonary angiography which demonstrated no pulmonary embolus, but there was bilateral pulmonary edema. Troponin was 17ng/l, BNP was 2700pg/ml. Furosemide 40mg was given intravenously by the general medical team. Critical care outreach asked for an urgent intensivist review given the highly unusual diagnosis of pulmonary edema in a man of this age. An immediate FUSIC Heart scan identified a dilated left ventricle with end diastolic diameter 7cm and severe global systolic impairment. The right ventricle was not severely impaired, with TAPSE 18mm. There was no significant pericardial effusion. Multiple B lines and trace pulmonary effusions were identified at the lung bases. The patient was urgently discussed with the regional cardiac unit in case of further deterioration, basic images were shared via a cloud system. A potential diagnosis of vaccination-associated myocarditis was considered,1 but in view of the low troponin, the presentation was felt most likely to represent decompensated chronic dilated cardiomyopathy. The patient disclosed a family history of early cardiac death in males. Aggressive diuresis was commenced. The patient was admitted to a monitored bed given the potential risk of arrhythmia or further haemodynamic deterioration. Advice was given that in the event of worsening hypotension, fluids should not be administered but the cardiac centre should be contacted immediately. Formal echocardiography confirmed the POCUS findings, with ejection fraction <35%. He was initiated on ACE inhibitors and beta adrenergic blockade. His symptoms improved and he was able to return home and to work, and is currently undergoing further investigations to establish the etiology of his condition. Conclusion(s): Early echocardiography provided early evidence of a cardiac cause for the patient's presentation and highlighted the severity of the underlying pathology. This directed early aggressive diuresis and safety-netting by virtue of discussion with a tertiary cardiac centre whilst it was established whether this was an acute or decompensated chronic pathology. Ultrasound findings: PLAX, PSAX and A4Ch views demonstrating a severely dilated (7cm end diastolic diameter) left ventricle with global severe systolic impairment.
ABSTRACT
We retrospectively report a case of rapid exchange of a percutaneous radiologic gastrostomy tube (balloon-occluded type catheter) via off-label use of a pigtail catheter for nutrition supply during a very early episode of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in an outpatient clinic. This case demonstrates that minimally invasive percutaneous procedures might be provided safely and effectively under appropriate precautions for preventing COVID-19 transmission during the pandemic.Copyright © 2023, Society of Gastrointestinal Intervention.
ABSTRACT
The current COVID-19 climate has caused an unforeseen supply shortage of iodinated contrast media (ICM) worldwide, disrupting global distribution.1 In addition, the scarcity has resulted in a ripple effect in healthcare facilities such as radiology departments where ICM is required to perform contrast-enhanced examinations. ICM plays a significant part in contrast-enhanced CT, angiography and fluoroscopic procedures within the radiology department, holding a primary role in the differentiation and diagnosis of pathologies which range from pulmonary emboli to tumours.1 Its use extends beyond radiology, where ICM is heavily relied on in cardiology, urology and gastrointestinal studies, further highlighting the heavy dependence on the critical agent.2 With the global increase in the number of CT examinations requested, where approximately 60% of studies require ICM, optimal usage of ICM must be considered to meet heightened demand.3 The shortage has represented an opportunity for imaging providers to re-examine current imaging protocols and identify whether non-contrast imaging, alternative contrast agents and other imaging modalities could be viable options moving forward.1,2 Additionally, current literature has discussed volume-reduction strategies and dual-energy use in newer-generation CT scanners to conserve ICM.1,4 This review will explore currently proposed solutions that can be implemented in the radiology department to maximise ICM supply with minimal impact on patient care.
ABSTRACT
Introduction: The Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus-2 have been associated with cardiovascular adverse events including acute myocardial infarction due to a prothrombotic and hypercoagulable status, and endothelial dysfunction. Case report: We report the case of a 62-year-old women, admitted to the hospital via the emergency room for acute chest pain and dyspnea. A nasopharyngeal swab was positive for COVID19 real-time reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction 11 day ago. On admission, she was hypotensive with systolic blood pressure measering 87 mmHg and tachycardic with 117 beats/min, oxygen saturation (SO2) was 94%. An 18-lead ECG revealed an infero-postero-lateral ST-elevation myocardial infarction with right ventricular involvement and a seconddegree- Mobitz Type 1 atrioventricular block. The coronary angiography from the right femoral artery showed acute thrombotic occlusion of the first diagonal branch with TIMI 0 flow and acute thrombotic occlusion of proximal right coronary artery with TIMI 0 flow. The most likely diagnosis was myocardial infarction secondary to a non-atherosclerotic coronary occlusion. The angioplasy was performed with dilatations with a semi compliant balloon, bailout implant of BMS, manual thrombus aspiration and intracoronary injection of tirofiban in the right coronary artery. The myocardial revascularization was ineffective. The patient developed significant severe hemodynamic instability and cardiac arrest for pulseless electric activity after 24 hours. Conclusion(s): The COVID-19 outbreak implies deep changes in the clinical profile and therapeutic management of STEMI patients who underwent PCI. At present, the natural history of coronary embolism is not well understood;however, the cardiac mortality rate are hight. This suggests these patients require further study to identify the natural history of the condition and to optimize management to improve outcome.
ABSTRACT
Background: Acute myocarditis corresponds to an acute inflammation of the myocardium whose origin is most often viral. Several viruses can be incriminated to note the parvovirus B19, the virus herpes of the group 6 and to a lesser degree the virus of the hepatitis C (VHC) [18,19]. Since 2019 and with the discovery of SARS COV2 some cases of myocarditis associated with covid have been noted, this last association is rare and is present in only 5% of cases [8]. The diagnosis of myocarditis is sometimes difficult and can lead to confusion with acute coronary syndrome, especially in cases of ST-segment elevation on the EKG, hence the interest of magnetic resonance imaging, which has made it possible in recent years to reduce the rate of unnecessary coronary angiography, especially in the case of young subjects with no cardiovascular risk factors. in this context we report the case of a 33 year old patient with no cardiovascular risk factors and no medical or surgical antecedents who was admitted to the emergency department for the management of acute chest pain related to acute post-covid myocarditis, the patient was initially admitted to the cardiology intensive care unit where he was put in condition and under analgesic treatment and under therapeutic protocal of covid 19 and under anticoagulation based on low molecular weight heparin at preventive dose with a good clinical evolution he was transferred thereafter to the clinical cardiology then declared outgoing under treatment of covid 19 with an appointment of control in 1 month.
ABSTRACT
Radiotherapy-induced secondary malignancy is a well-known occurrence. During the COVID-19 pandemic, many people have undergone serial computed tomography (CT) imaging, and concerns have been raised regarding radiation-induced malignancies due to frequent scanning. Accordingly, various low and ultra-low-dose CT (LDCT) thorax protocols have been developed to reduce the dose of radiation. Major governing bodies worldwide have established guidelines regarding the indications for CT scans and chest X-rays during the pandemic. We, therefore, aimed to provide facts about the effects of radiation (both diagnostic and therapeutic). Through this article, we intend to break the myths and 'mithya' (misbeliefs) regarding diagnostic radiation and its association with cancer in this COVID-19 era. For this review, we performed a search in Google using specific keywords pertaining to imaging during COVID-19 and radiation risk. We also included the names of various global governing bodies in the Google search. We included only full text articles and guidelines from authentic websites. From this review, we conclude that if we follow the recommendations of various global governing bodies and use CT scan only in cases of moderate to severe COVID-related symptoms, adhere to the principle of 'as low as reasonably achievable' for radiation protection, and use LDCT scan protocols, we can significantly reduce the mean effective radiation dose delivered and the estimated cancer risk.Copyright © 2023 Cancer Research, Statistics, and Treatment. All rights reserved.
ABSTRACT
Aim. To determine ultrasound, computed tomography and angiographic image characteristics for soft tissue hemorrhages/hematomas, the sequence of using imaging methods in patients infected with SARS-CoV-2, to study the morphology of changes in soft tissues, to determine the essence of the concept and to develop treatment tactics for this complication of COVID-19. Material and methods. During 4 months of treatment of elderly patients (+60) infected with SARS-CoV-2, 40 patients were identified with soft tissue hemorrhages/hematomas, of which 26 (65%) patients with large hematomas (>10 cm in size and > 1000 ml in volume). The analysis of clinical and laboratory parameters, methods of instrumental diagnostics (ultrasound - 26 patients, CT - 10 patients, angiography - 9 patients, punctures - 6 patients) was carried out;autopsy material was studied in 11 cases. Results. Image characteristics of hemorrhages/hematomas of soft tissue density were obtained using modern instrumental methods, and the sequence of application of visualization methods was determined. A tactic for managing a patient with stopped and ongoing bleeding has been developed. The morphological substrate of hemorrhagic complications in a new viral infection was studied. All patients were treated with conservative and minimally invasive procedures (embolization, puncture with pressure bandage). 15 patients (57.7%) recovered, 11 patients (42.3%) died from the progression of COVID-19 complications. Conclusion. Comprehensive clinical and laboratory sequential instrumental diagnosis of soft tissue hemorrhages in COVID-19. Treatment should be conservative and significantly invasive. The use of the term "soft tissue hematoma" in SARS-CoV-2 infected patients is not a natural quality of the normal pathological process and should not be observed from our point of view.Copyright © 2022 Rostovskii Gosudarstvennyi Meditsinskii Universitet. All rights reserved.
ABSTRACT
Background: Stroke is the leading cause of death and disability worldwide. In COVID-19 pandemic, stroke remains to be a medical emergency. To treat patients with acute ischemic stroke [AIS], early intravenous thrombolysis is highly time sensitive. This research investigated the impact of regionally imposed social and healthcare restrictions of COVID-19 on the time metrics in the management of AIS patients admitted at the stroke unit center in Srinagarind Hospital. Objective(s): Comparison of door to needle time for intravenous thrombolysis for AIS patients before and after the COVID-19 outbreak. Material(s) and Method(s): The present study is a retrospective analysis of patients with AIS who received intravenous tissue plasminogen activator [tPA] from 1 January 2019 to 31 December 2020 in Srinagarind Hospital, Khon Kaen. The patients admitted before and after the COVID-19 outbreak [January 13, 2020, as officially announced by the World Health Organization] were screened to collect sociodemographic data, medical history information, and symptom onset status from clinical medical records and to compared door-to-needle time (DNT) for intravenous thrombolysis before and after the outbreak. Result(s): A total of 239 patients were included, of which 113 were enrolled before and 126 after the COVID-19 outbreak. According to the findings, DNT is 35.3 minutes before the pandemic and 35.8 minutes after the epidemic. Conclusion(s): COVID-19 has remarkable impacts on the management of AIS. However, DNT for before and after COVID-19 outbreak is nearly identical. It was established that administering intravenous thrombolysis to patients in the emergency room rather than the stroke unit allowed for speedier access. Therefore, a policy which provides quick AIS treatments in COVID-19 situations should be implemented.Copyright © 2023 Journal of the Medical Association of Thailand.
ABSTRACT
Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) began to spread in December 2019 and was declared a pandemic by WHO on 11 March 2020. Pulmonary embolism (PE) is a known sequel to COVID-19 infection. Many patients showed worsened symptoms of thrombotic events of pulmonary arteries during the second week of the disease for which computed tomography pulmonary angiography (CTPA) is recommended. The most frequent complications in critically ill patients are prothrombotic coagulation abnormalities and thromboembolism. So, this study aimed to assess the prevalence of PE in patients with COVID-19 infection and to evaluate the relation to disease severity on CTPA findings. Methods: This cross-sectional study was performed to evaluate the patients who tested positive for COVID-19 and underwent CTPA. COVID-19 infection in participants was confirmed by a PCR of nasopharyngeal or oropharyngeal swab samples. Frequencies of computed tomography severity scores and CTPA were calculated and compared with clinical and laboratory findings. Results: The study included 92 patients with COVID-19 infection. Positive PE was found in 18.5% of the patients. The mean age of the patients was 59.83±13.58 years with an age range of 30-86 years. Among the total participants, 27.2% underwent ventilation, 19.6% died during treatment, and 80.4% of them got discharged. PE was developed in patients who did not receive prophylactic anticoagulation, which is statistically significant (P≤0.001). There was also a significant relationship between mechanical ventilation and CTPA findings. Conclusions: The authors conclude from their study that PE is one of the complications of COVID-19 infection. Rising D-dimer during the second week of disease alerts clinicians to do CTPA to exclude or confirm PE. This will help in the early diagnosis and treatment of PE.
ABSTRACT
PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to assess the efficacy of transarterial embolization in COVID-19 patients with an arterial bleeding and to investigate differences between various patient groups concerning survival. METHOD: We retrospectively reviewed COVID-19 patients undergoing transarterial embolization due to an arterial bleeding in a multicenter study from April 2020 to July 2022 and analyzed the technical success of embolization and survival rate. 30-day survival between various patient groups was analyzed. The Chi- square test and Fisher's exact test were used for testing association between the categorical variables. RESULTS: 53 COVID-19 patients (age: 57.3 ± 14.3 years, 37 male) received 66 angiographies due to an arterial bleeding. The initial embolization was technically successful in 98.1% (52/53). In 20.8% (11/53) of patients, additional embolization was necessary due to a new arterial bleeding. A majority of 58.5% (31/53) had a severe course of COVID-19 infection necessitating ECMO-therapy and 86.8% (46/53) of patients received anticoagulation. 30-day survival rate in patients with ECMO-therapy was significantly lower than without ECMO-therapy (45.2% vs. 86.4%, p = 0.004). Patients with anticoagulation did not have a lower 30-day survival rate than without anticoagulation (58.7% vs. 85.7%, p = 0.23). COVID-19 patients with ECMO-therapy developed more frequently a re-bleeding after embolization than non-ECMO-patients (32.3% vs. 4.5%, p = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: Transarterial embolization is a feasible, safe, and effective procedure in COVID-19 patients with arterial bleeding. ECMO-patients have a lower 30-day survival rate than non-ECMO-patients and have an increased risk for re-bleeding. Treatment with anticoagulation could not be identified as a risk factor for higher mortality.
ABSTRACT
Introduction: Acute pancreatitis affects a significant population globally. Usual etiologies are gallstones, alcohol, hypertriglyceridemia, medications;less frequent are trauma, hypercalcemia, infections, toxins, ischemia, anatomic anomalies, vasculitis, and idiopathic. Pancreatitis post coronary intervention is an uncommon cause with only 19 published cases in the last two decades. Being cognizant of this etiology is important given the increasing number of patients undergoing angiography. Case Description/Methods: An 81-year-old female with hypertension, diabetes, peripheral arterial disease, prior cholecystectomy underwent left lower extremity angioplasty at an outside center. Within a few hours, she started having severe epigastric pain radiating to her back, nausea, vomiting and loose bloody stool. She presented to the emergency department 24 hours after symptom onset. Epigastric tenderness was present on exam. Labs revealed leukocytosis (24,450/muL), elevated lipase (1410 U/L), elevated creatinine (1.3 mg/dL), lactate (3.1 mmol/L), calcium 9.4 mg/dL and triglycerides 161 mg/dL. Incidentally, found to be positive for COVID-19. Normal common bile duct diameter seen on sonogram. CT angiogram of the abdomen/pelvis showed acute pancreatitis, duodenal and central small bowel enteritis (Figure). She was not on any medications known to cause pancreatitis and denied alcohol use. Patient improved with analgesics and intravenous fluids. She had no recurrence of bloody stools and hemoglobin remained stable. On day 4, she was able to tolerate a regular diet, and leukocyte count and creatinine normalized. Patient did not have any COVID respiratory symptoms, and was discharged. Discussion(s): Given the temporal association to angioplasty and no other identifiable cause, acute pancreatitis was presumed to be due to the contrast used during angioplasty. Other possibilities included cholesterol embolism but no peripheral signs of cholesterol embolism were seen. Patient was an asymptomatic COVID-19 case. Although, there are case series of pancreatitis due to COVID, those were found in very sick symptomatic patients. On review of literature, cholesterol embolism was identified as a definite cause only on autopsy or laparotomy (Table). Other possible mechanisms are: high viscosity of the contrast media leading to ischemia and necrosis, contrast causing NF-kB activation followed by epithelial damage, and vasospasm. Pancreatitis after coronary angiography is rare, nonetheless, an important differential especially if there is a temporal relationship.
ABSTRACT
Introduction: Splenic rupture is a potentially life-threatening condition often associated with trauma or viral infection. Most cases of splenic rupture are due to trauma, viral infection, lymphoproliferative disease, malaria, tick borne illness, splenic neoplasms, connective tissue disease, or in one case, sneezing. Spontaneous splenic rupture (SSR) is a rare condition with less than five cases reported. In this case, we present a 20-year-old male who was seen with abdominal pain who was found to have an SSR with no clear etiology. Case Description/Methods: A 20-year-old male with no relevant past medical history presented with abdominal pain that radiated to the left shoulder. The patient reported the pain began after an episode of emesis which occurred 12 hours prior to arrival. He reported experiencing shortness of breath and pain on inspiration. He denied any fall or trauma, recent travel or sick contacts, fevers, weight loss, or night sweats. His social history was significant for occasional marijuana use. Upon physical exam, the patient had diffuse abdominal tenderness most pronounced in the left upper quadrant without any palpable masses. Relevant labs included a hemoglobin of 12.2, WBC count within normal limits and unremarkable manual differential, and an INR of 1. Blood parasite, heterophile antibodies, COVID, influenza, CMV, and HIV were negative. Computed tomography angiography (CTA) revealed hematoma at the splenic hilum. Interventional radiology was consulted and did not recommend intervention at time of initial presentation. Patient was admitted;his hemoglobin remained stable and he was monitored with serial abdominal exam then discharged the following day. Imaging was repeated one month later which revealed near complete resolution of hematoma. (Figure) Discussion: SSR should be considered on the differential diagnosis of physicians when encountering patients who present with LUQ pain with unclear etiology. The patient presented with the characteristic Kehr's sign (left diaphragmatic irritation resulting in referred pain to the left shoulder) but not the Ballance sign (palpable tender mass in the left upper quadrant). The incidence of SSR is estimated to be around 1 to 7% with a mortality rate of 12.2% so a broad differential for young patients presenting with abdominal pain must be entertained and should include splenic rupture as it is a potentially life-threatening condition.
ABSTRACT
Introduction: The mortality rate of patients hospitalized with a lower gastrointestinal bleed has been reported at 1.1% in the United States from 2005 to 2014. Pseudoaneurysms, typically associated with pancreatitis, have been described in case reports as a rare condition with a small subset presenting as gastrointestinal bleeding. Our study describes a rare case of recurrent lower gastrointestinal bleeding diagnosed as a pseudoaneurysm by endoscopy and angiography. Case Description/Methods: A 38-year-old male presented to our facility from a long-term care facility with hematochezia and blood clots per gastrostomy-jejunostomy. He had recently been hospitalized for severe coronavirus disease 2019 with a complicated hospital course in the intensive care unit including necrotizing pancreatitis with an abdominal drain, multiple secondary infections, tracheostomy, and percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy-jejunostomy. On previous hospitalization, he was found to have a small pseudoaneurysm of the gastroduodenal artery and received embolization of the gastroduodenal and gastroepiploic arteries at that time. During transport to our hospital, he was noted to have tachycardia, hypotension requiring norepinephrine, and was transfused one unit of red blood cells. Hemoglobin at this time was 7.5 g/dl after transfusion. Esophagogastroduodenoscopy was completed and showed a gastrojejunostomy tube in the expected location but was noted to be tight to the mucosa, which was pale in appearance. Flexible sigmoidoscopy revealed localized areas of edematous and erythematous mucosa with some associated oozing throughout the sigmoid colon. Repeat evaluation was completed one week later due to recurrent hematochezia. Colonoscopy was performed with identification of an apparent fistulous tract in the sigmoid colon located at 35 cm. Computed tomography angiography localized a pseudoaneurysm arising from the marginal artery of Drummond just proximal to its anastomosis with the ascending branch of the left colic artery and was successfully embolized. Discussion(s): Pseudoaneurysms, such as the one described in this case, have been shown to be associated with pancreatitis and can result if a pseudocyst involves adjacent vasculature. Gastrointestinal bleeding is a rare presentation of this condition. However, this case highlights the importance of repeat colonoscopy and angiography in the setting of a lower gastrointestinal bleed of unknown etiology.
ABSTRACT
Background: Iatrogenic coronary artery dissection during diagnostic or therapeutic catheterization is a rare and mortal complication that may result in a newly developed myocardial infarction. In this study, we aimed to share the results of CABG treatment of patients with iatrogenic coronary artery dissection after coronary angiography (CAG) in our clinic. Method(s): All patients who underwent CAG or percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in our hospital between January 2014 and December 2021 were analyzed retrospectively and patients who underwent CABG after iatrogenic coronary artery dissection were included in the study. The dissection classification was achived according to the National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute (NHLBI) classification. Result(s): During the eight years, CAG was applied to 20,398 patients and PCI to 9583 patients. Needed to treat CABG in iatrogenic coronary artery dissection developed in 17 of the patients (0.06%). LMCA was dissected in 6 (35.3%) patients and LAD in 6 (35.3%), CX in 2 (11.8%) and RCA dissection in 3 (17.6%). 3 patients (17.6%) had an intubation time longer than 48 hours. One of them has recently had a COVID infection. Another was suffering from pulmonary edema. The other patient died on the 4th postoperative day due to low cardiac output. The length of stay in the intensive care unit was 2 (min: 1 - max: 13) days. The hospital stay was 6 (min: 4 - max: 20) days. Conclusion(s): The development of a critical clinical condition prior to surgery is strongly associated with a higher probability of early and late postoperative death. For this reason, it is clear that the treatments applied at every stage of the pre-, per-, and postoperative period are the most important determinants of the results.Copyright © 2023, CKS.
ABSTRACT
Purpose of study COVID-19 primarily affects the respiratory system from flu-like syndrome to acute hypoxic respiratory failure. Neurological manifestations are uncommon and can result in serious complications. We report a unique case of sudden onset of rapidly progressive encephalopathy in the setting of COVID-19. Methods used Reviewed the manifestations, clinical course, and outcome for a patient presenting with altered mental status secondary to COVID-19. Summary of results A 48-year-old with no significant past medical history presented to the emergency department complaining of severe headache for four days. His vital signs on presentation showed a blood pressure of 154/90, pulse of 114 bpm, temperature of 99.6 degreeF, and oxygen saturation of 97% on room air. Physical exam was unremarkable. Lab work showed elevated D-dimer 8,500 ng/L, Elevated ESR:42, LDH:340 and Ferritin:692. White blood count: 7.59 uL, Platelets 50 x 103 uL. Computer tomography angiography (CTA) of the chest showed bilateral multifocal pneumonia. CT Head was performed and was negative for an acute hemorrhage, hydrocephalus or territorial infarcts. Patient spiked a fever shortly after admission 103degreeF. Patient was started on Ceftriaxone and Azithromycin. Blood and urine cultures were positive for Klebsiella pneumonia. Patient was re-evaluated in the morning and was found altered with associated neck stiffness. Antibiotics were switched to cover for suspected meningitis. Neurology was consulted and recommended lumbar puncture. Within a few hours, the patient's mental status deteriorated and was found to be hypertensive with a blood pressure of 220/110. Repeat CT Head was negative. The patient was tested and found to be positive for COVID-19. Patient further decompensated within a few hours and became unresponsive, pulseless. ACLS was performed and the patient was transferred to the intensive care unit. Conclusions This case report highlights the heterogenous presentation in patients with COVID-19 and the importance of recognizing a new onset, severe headache as the only initial presentation. Headaches in some cases may precede the respiratory symptoms or may be the only manifestations in COVID-19 patients and it is crucial to be aware of the neurological complications and the rapid decompensation these patients may undergo if not recognized early.
ABSTRACT
The article discusses the task of radiologic technologists to know clotting disorders and image them best. Topics covered include the various symptoms and blood clots of patients with thrombotic disorders, and medical imaging's beneficial indication of the severity and blood clots' location in the patient's circulatory system, and support for accurate diagnosis and appropriate treatment. Also noted is the boost for positive patient outcomes when the health care team works together.
ABSTRACT
Case Presentation: A 19 year old male presented with sudden onset chest pain radiating to back. He was a smoker and denied using cocaine since his last hospitalization for cocaine-induced myocardial infarction 2 years ago. UDS was negative. EKG showed normal sinus rhythm with no ST-T wave changes. Initial troponin was 0.850. Potassium levels were low at 2.9 mmol/L but other labs were normal. Chest CT angiography ruled out aortic dissection. He was started on heparin drip. Stat Echocardiogram showed LVEF of 55-60% with no wall motion abnormalities. Repeat potassium levels normalized after replacement, however, his troponins were trending up from 3.9 and 11.5. He continued to complain of severe chest pain, so underwent cardiac catheterization which showed normal coronary arteries and LVEF 55-60%. Heparin drip was discontinued and NSAIDs and colchicine were started. Cardiac MRI (see Figure) was done that showed patchy mid-wall and epicardial delayed gadolinium enhancement involving the basal inferolateral wall, with mild hyperintense signal on the triple IR sequence, suggestive of myocarditis. On further probing, he reported receiving a second dose of Moderna COVID vaccine 3 days prior to presentation. Discussion(s): In December 2019, a novel RNA virus causing COVID-19 infection was reported, which quickly reached a pandemic level. COVID-19 vaccines were granted emergency use authorization by FDA. With millions of people receiving COVID-19 vaccinations worldwide, rare adverse effects are now being reported. The benefits of vaccination undoubtedly outweigh any minor side effects. However major adverse effects like this are potentially fatal. This case report warrants further investigation into the association of myocarditis with COVID-19 vaccinations and further recommendations regarding vaccination in younger adults.
ABSTRACT
It is now widely known that COVID-19 can also cause various extrapulmonary manifestations. Possible mechanisms of cardiovascular damage include direct myocardial damage due to hypercoagulability caused by systemic inflammation, which may also lead to destabilisation of coronary plaques. We present a case of a 30-year-old young man following asymptomatic COVID-19 infection, who was admitted to the emergency room of the Grande Ospedale Metropolitano di Reggio Calabria, Italy, with typical chest pain. The patient had no cardiovascular disease, cardiovascular risk factors including no family history of cardiovascular disease. Urgent coronary angiography showed critical stenosis of the middle-proximal portion of the left anterior descending artery (80%) with ulcerated plaque appearance. Regardless of cardiovascular risk factors, our case report emphasises the need to determine COVID-19 status in all patients with acute myocardial infarction during this pandemic.Copyright © 2023, CKS.